Our instructional programs are backed by dedicated departments that ensure educators and students have the exact resources they need:

With approximately 550 employees, the Belgrade School District is one of the largest employers in Belgrade. While schools are fundamentally educational institutions rather than commercial businesses, managing an organization of this scale requires essential operational departments similar to businesses:

Strong leadership ensures our district remains accountable, transparent, and responsive to community needs:

School districts manage specialized daily operations focused on student safety, health, and well-being:

We appreciate all of the Belgrade School District employees and our School Board Trustees who partner together to educate our community's youth. Whether they are on the frontline work with students, or behind the scenes providing support, our schools couldn't run without them. 

In Montana, school districts don't operate with one giant checking account where all revenues are deposited and expenses are paid. Instead, money is accounted for in separate funds, or what I like to describe as buckets.

Each bucket has a purpose. Some pay for daily operations, others for transportation, buildings, technology, or repayment of bonds. How money gets into a bucket and what it can be spent on are governed by state law, voter authorization, grant requirements, or other restrictions.

Why make it so complicated?  This system helps ensure public dollars are spent for their intended purposes. It creates transparency, accountability, and a way for taxpayers to see how money is being used. It also means a district can have money available in one fund while facing a shortage in another. And no, unfortunately, we cannot just tip one bucket into another and call it creative accounting.

Montana has quite a few school funds, but here are some of the major ones you may hear about when discussing our district's finances.

Think of the General Fund as the household checking account used to pay most of your everyday expenses. It supports classroom instruction, employee salaries and benefits, educational programs, supplies, utilities, custodial services, and many other costs associated with operating our schools.

The General Fund is heavily influenced by student enrollment and Montana's school funding formulas. State funding and local property taxes are important sources of revenue.

The General Fund receives considerable attention during budget discussions because, at its heart, school budgets are mostly about people. Salaries and benefits make up the vast majority of General Fund expenditures, and keeping this bucket full often requires districts to ask local voters to approve additional funding through school levies. While we certainly have employees who wear multiple hats (and some who seem to have an entire hat collection), educating students and keeping schools running still requires a lot of people. Teachers, paraprofessionals, administrators, custodians, technology staff, and countless others all play important roles. Unfortunately, even our most talented multitaskers can only be in so many places at once, and all those people need to be paid!

These buckets are associated with school facilities, including eligible construction, renovation, repairs, and major maintenance. Think of them as the money you set aside to replace your roof, repair the furnace, or add another bedroom when your family outgrows the house. Montana's Building Reserve Fund has different authorizations and requirements depending how the money is funded, state or local, voted or nonvoted levy, and its intended use.

Here is where people sometimes get confused. If the district has money available for a building project, why not use it to hire more teachers? Because money authorized for construction or major maintenance generally cannot simply be redirected to regular classroom salaries. Having money to repair the roof doesn't mean you have additional money in your grocery budget.

When voters approve school bonds and the district issues those bonds, the district becomes responsible for repaying the borrowed money, including principal and interest.

Those payments are accounted for in the Debt Service Fund. Much like a household mortgage, these are financial obligations that must be paid according to established schedules. The money collected to repay bonds is not an extra source of revenue available for school operations. And just like paying off your house doesn't automatically put more money in your employer's payroll budget, reducing school debt doesn't automatically increase General Fund budget.

Getting students to and from school is important, but Montana treats transportation differently from classroom operations.

The Transportation Fund supports eligible student transportation expenses, while the Bus Depreciation Reserve Fund provides a way to save for replacing school buses. Think of one bucket as paying to operate your family vehicles and the other as saving for their eventual replacement. You wouldn't want to spend all your vehicle replacement savings on gas and then discover you have nothing available when your car finally gives up. School buses have a remarkable ability to get older every year, regardless of whether the budget is ready.

When most people think about technology in schools, they picture laptops, tablets, interactive displays, and other devices students use in classrooms. But that's only the technology we can see. Behind the scenes, districts spend considerable resources on things most people never think about, including internet service, firewalls, antivirus protection, network security, content filtering, software licenses, and systems that help protect student and staff information.

And then there's the speed at which technology changes. If we're preparing students to be college and career ready, they need opportunities to learn with technology that resembles what they'll encounter beyond our classrooms, not devices that belong in a museum. We don't need the newest gadget every time something shiny hits the market, but we also can't expect students to be future-ready using equipment that's several generations behind.

Montana's Technology Fund helps districts plan for eligible technology purchases, improvements, and related expenses. Think of it as more than a fund for buying computers. It's an investment in the infrastructure, security, and tools that make modern learning possible. And just when you think you've finally caught up with technology, someone announces the next generation. Apparently, technology never received the memo about school budget limitations.

Putting devices in students' hands is only part of our responsibility. We also have to provide a reliable, secure network and take steps to keep students safe while they're online. Think of cybersecurity like building a fence around your backyard. The initial investment can be expensive, but the work doesn't stop once the fence is up. You still have to stain it, replace aging boards, reinforce weak spots, and patch the occasional hole where the family dog has decided to make a break for freedom. Technology security works much the same way. Firewalls, antivirus protection, and network security systems require ongoing maintenance, updates, and investments to keep up with new threats. And unfortunately, just like a determined dachshund, the people trying to find a way into our systems are remarkably persistent and always looking for the next hole in the fence.

We all know that hungry students have a harder time learning. Providing nutritious, appealing meals is an important part of supporting student success, and our school nutrition staff work hard every day to make that happen. But feeding hundreds of students each day is also a business operation, complete with food purchases, staffing, equipment, and expenses that seem to increase every time we visit the grocery store.

School nutrition operates through its own fund, supported primarily by meal payments, federal reimbursements, and other nutrition-related revenues. Ideally, the program is self-supporting, meaning it generates enough revenue to cover its operating expenses without relying on the General Fund.

Why does that matter? Because unpaid meal balances, rising food prices, and increasing labor costs can quickly create a financial shortfall. And unlike some household budgets, where we might joke about being in the red until payday, school nutrition programs cannot simply carry a negative year-end fund balance into the next school year. If revenues aren't enough to cover expenses, the district must use other allowable resources to make up the difference. In Montana, that can mean charging eligible expenses, such as food purchases, to the General Fund rather than the School Food Services Fund. This doesn't mean outstanding meal debt has been forgiven or written off. It means the district still needs to cover the cost of operating the program while those unpaid balances remain outstanding.

And here's where our buckets start affecting one another. Every General Fund dollar used to support school nutrition is a dollar no longer available for other operating needs, whether that's classroom supplies, curriculum, staffing, or other priorities.

Think of it like running a family restaurant. You want to serve great food, provide generous portions, and make sure everyone leaves satisfied. But if the cost of ingredients, staffing, and unpaid tabs keeps exceeding what comes in, someone has to cover the difference. Unfortunately, the General Fund doesn't have an unlimited credit card tucked away for emergencies. Our goal isn't to make a profit from feeding students. It's to provide quality, nutritious meals while managing the program responsibly so that the School Food Services bucket can support itself without dipping into the bucket that pays for educating those same students.

Here's one that might surprise you. In Montana, certain employer payroll costs, including contributions to retirement systems, Social Security, Medicare, and unemployment insurance, are accounted for in the Retirement Fund rather than the General Fund. That means the cost of employing someone can involve more than one financial bucket. So, when we talk about the cost of staffing our schools, we must look beyond just the salary appearing in the General Fund.

Federal and state grants are another important part of school finance.

Some dollars are provided specifically for programs such as supporting students with additional educational needs, professional development, or other designated purposes.

Think of receiving a gift card to a grocery store. It's valuable, and it helps your household, but you can't use it to pay your electric bill and you can’t count on it being there next time you go to the grocery store.

Grant funding works similarly. The district may receive additional resources, but those dollars often come with very specific spending rules, reporting requirements, and deadlines. And yes, sometimes the paperwork feels almost as expensive as the money we're receiving. 

Yes, but Montana school finance has rules about when and how. State law allows certain transfers between funds, but those transfers may require board approval, public hearings, or even voter approval. We can't simply pour money from one bucket into another because one happens to be running low.

But here's an important distinction: Moving money between funds is not the same as paying an eligible expense from a different fund. This is where I like to use a little creative accounting—the perfectly legal kind, of course! Instead of asking whether we can move money into the General Fund, our team often asks the opposite question: What expenses can we appropriately pay from another fund to take some pressure off the General Fund?

For example, certain transportation expenses may be paid from the Transportation Fund, while eligible special education costs may be supported by other dedicated funding sources. Even some school nutrition expenses can be paid directly from the General Fund when necessary and allowable. We're not transferring money between buckets; we're determining which bucket is legally allowed to pay the bill.

The General Fund supports a broad range of school operating expenses, but that doesn't mean it should pay for everything. The goal is to use each funding source appropriately and strategically, preserving as much General Fund money as possible for the everyday work of educating students.

After all, if one bucket can legally pay the bill, there's no reason to keep dipping into the bucket that's already doing most of the heavy lifting!

When we talk about Belgrade Schools' finances, it's important to remember that having money available across all district funds is not the same as having money available for everyday school operations.

We might have money set aside to replace a school bus, repair a roof, upgrade technology, or make bond payments. These are important expenses, and planning for them is part of responsible financial management. At the same time, we could be facing General Fund budget challenges because of declining enrollment, rising operating costs, or changes in state funding.

Both situations can be true.

It doesn't mean money is being hidden or that the district is making unnecessary purchases while other needs go unmet. It means different funds have different purposes, and sometimes the bucket with money in it isn't the one that needs filling.

So, the next time you hear that Belgrade Schools is purchasing technology or making facility improvements while also discussing General Fund budget challenges, consider asking a different question. Instead of "Why are we spending money on that?" try asking "Which fund is paying for it, and could that money legally be used for something else?" That one question can change how we understand the district's financial decisions.

If you remember nothing else about school finance and its many buckets, remember these few things:

At the end of the day, managing school finances isn't simply about keeping the buckets full. It's about making sure we're using each one responsibly while balancing today's needs with tomorrow's obligations. And while dumping everything into one giant bucket might make my job a whole lot easier, I'm fairly certain the Montana Legislature, our auditors, and more than a few taxpayers would have something to say about that. Besides, I love what I do, I love Belgrade Schools, and I'd really like to keep my job!

Finance Director/District Clerk

cfisher@bsd44.org

Submit an idea for a topic HERE